Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 87(5): 603-610, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33969653

RESUMEN

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is implicated in the ongoing pandemic across the globe since December 2019. It was first notified by China from Wuhan on 31 December 2020 and transmission to healthcare workers was first reported on 20 January 2020. Human-to-human transmission is mainly by droplet infection. At present no effective vaccine is available. Our speciality needs to collectively address the urgent issue of risk of transmission in dermatology practice. A case series of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) from Wuhan described that 41.3% of their patients may have acquired the infection from the hospital. Of all the infected health care workers, 77.5% worked in general wards and departments. These data highlight the significant risk of nosocomial transmission of COVID-19 and also the higher risk in general wards and departments compared to the emergency room or intensive care unit. Dermatology patients are generally seen in clinics and in outpatient departments in hospitals. Patients wait together in the waiting area, intermingle and then are seen by the physician in their chamber. This can cause transmission of the pathogen among patients and from patient to physician. Social distancing, hand hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment are important for preventing the spread of infection and dermatology practices also have to incorporate these aspects. Telemedicine is becoming an important tool for the management of dermatology patients in these times. At-risk patients in dermatology also need to be given priority care. Protocols for the use of immunosuppressants and biologics in dermatology during the pandemic are being developed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Dermatología/organización & administración , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , India , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Enfermedades de la Piel/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación , Salas de Espera
2.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 21(4): 611-614, 2020 12 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388006

RESUMEN

There is an emergency need for early ambulatory treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in acutely ill patients in an attempt to reduce disease progression and the risks of hospitalization and death. Such management should be applied in high-risk patients age > 50 years or with one or more medical problems including cardiovascular disease. We evaluated a total of 922 outpatients from March to September 2020. All patients underwent contemporary real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay tests from anterior nasal swab samples. Patients age 50.5 ± 13.7 years (range 12 to 89), 61.6% women, at moderate or high risk for COVID-19 received empiric management via telemedicine. At least two agents with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 (zinc, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin) and one antibiotic (azithromycin, doxycycline, ceftriaxone) were used along with inhaled budesonide and/or intramuscular dexamethasone consistent with the emergent science on early COVID-19 treatment. For patients with high severity of symptoms, urgent in-clinic administration of albuterol nebulizer, inhaled budesonide, and intravenous volume expansion with supplemental parenteral thiamine 500 mg, magnesium sulfate 4 grams, folic acid 1 gram, vitamin B12 1 mg. A total of 320/922 (34.7%) were treated resulting in 6/320 (1.9%) and 1/320 (0.3%) patients that were hospitalized and died, respectively. We conclude that early ambulatory (not hospitalized, treated at home), multidrug therapy is safe, feasible, and associated with low rates of hospitalization and death. Early treatment should be considered for high-risk patients as an emergency measure while we await randomized trials and guidelines for ambulatory management.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Leprostáticos/uso terapéutico , Telemedicina/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21393945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abuse of topical corticosteroids (TC), especially over the face, is prevalent worldwide, including in India. Data about the magnitude of this problem in our country is lacking. AIMS: The aims of this study were to ascertain the demographics, magnitude and clinical features of TC misuse on the face in the dermatology outpatient department (OPD) attendees in order to raise awareness about this problem and to analyze its causes. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter questionnaire-based clinical study conducted at 12 dermatology centers nationwide. Patients with relevant facial dermatoses reporting to the investigator were asked about their current use of over-the-counter topical formulations and a structured questionnaire applied in case the same was confirmed to be TC. RESULTS: A total of 2926 patients with facial dermatoses were screened, of which 433 (14.8%) were using TC. TC was used as a fairness/general purpose cream or aftershave in 126 (29%) and in 104 (24%) for acne. Steroid combinations were used by 258 (59.6%). Potent and super-potent TC were significantly (P = 0.05) more frequently used by the rural/suburban population. The younger age groups used more potent formulations. A non-physician recommendation for TC use was obtainable in 257 (59.3%) patients. Of these, 232 (90.3%) were for potent/super-potent steroids. Among 176 physician prescriptions, 78 (44.3%) were from non-dermatologists. All non-physician prescriptions and 146 (83%) physician prescriptions for TC were inappropriately refilled. Adverse effects were seen in 392 (90.5%) TC users. Acne/exacerbation of acne was the most common adverse effect. CONCLUSIONS: TC misuse in patients with facial dermatoses is quite common, and most of this use is unwarranted. Use as a fairness cream is the most common indication in this cohort. LIMITATIONS: This was an OPD-based study and, therefore, it may or may not accurately reflect the community data.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Cara , Dermatosis Facial/inducido químicamente , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos , Administración Tópica , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Dermatosis Facial/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21393966

RESUMEN

DEFINITION: Sclerotherapy is defined as the targeted elimination of small vessels, varicose veins and vascular anomalies by the injection of a sclerosant. The aim of sclerotherapy is to damage the vessel wall and transform it into a fibrous cord that cannot be recanalized. It is a simple, cost-effective, efficacious and esthetically acceptable modality for both therapeutic and esthetic purposes. INDICATIONS: Therapeutic indications include varicose veins and vascular malformations. Esthetic indications include telangiectasias and reticular veins. In the management of varicose veins, it may need to be combined with other surgical methods of treatment, such as ligation of the saphenofemoral junction, stab ligation of perforators and stripping. A surgical opinion may be necessary. METHODOLOGY: A thorough knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the venous system of the legs, basic principles of venous insufficiency, methods of diagnosis and, in addition, uses, mechanisms of action and complications of sclerosing agents and proper compression techniques are important pre-requisites to successful sclerotherapy. Although various sclerosing agents are available, polidoconal and sodium tetradecyl sulfate are most commonly used. More recently, these sclerosants have been used in microfoam form for increased efficacy. The basic principle of a successful sclerotherapy technique is the use of an optimal volume and concentration of the sclerosant according to the size of the vessel. The sclerosant is injected carefully into the vessel and compression is applied. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Contraindications include superficial and deep venous thrombosis, sapheno-femoral junction incompetence, pregnancy, myocardial decompensation, migraine, hypercoagulable state, serious systemic illness, dependency edema, immobility, arterial disease, diabetes mellitus and allergic reactions to sclerosants. COMPLICATIONS: While sclerotherapy is usually a safe procedure, complications may occur due to inappropriate patient selection or improper injection techniques. The complications may be acute or delayed. Complications include hyperpigmentation, matting, local urticaria, cutaneous necrosis, microthrombi, accidental intra-arterial injection, phlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, thromboembolism, scintillating scotomas, nerve damage and allergic reactions. PHYSICIAN QUALIFICATION: Sclerotherapy may be administered by a surgeon or dermatologist who has acquired adequate training during post-graduation or through recognized fellowships and workshops dedicated to sclerotherapy. He should have an adequate knowledge of the anatomy of the venous system, be able to diagnose and manage venous disease and its associated consequences as well as possess the necessary skills to perform the procedures, understand the appropriate indications and limitations, technique modifications and management of the potential adverse sequelae associated with sclerotherapy and also understand the pharmacology of the sclerosing solutions. FACILITY: The procedure may be performed in the physician's procedure room.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Dermatología/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Escleroterapia/normas , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Dermatología/métodos , Humanos , Soluciones Esclerosantes/administración & dosificación , Escleroterapia/métodos , Várices/diagnóstico , Várices/terapia , Malformaciones Vasculares/diagnóstico , Malformaciones Vasculares/terapia
6.
Hansen. int ; 1(2): 161-166, 1976. graf
Artículo en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, HANSEN, Hanseníase, SESSP-ILSLACERVO, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1226255

RESUMEN

After seeking to establish the fact that the structures of institutions for the treatment of Hansen's disease are normally obsolete, archaic, and foster paternalism and sentimentality, the author proposes a restructuring of these institutions with the end of transforming them into modern hospitals. Basically, the author proposes a division of these institutions into three areas: hospital proper, residential area, asylum area


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Atención Ambulatoria , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Lepra/diagnóstico , Lepra/epidemiología , Lepra/rehabilitación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA